Anyone who has moved retirement money out of an old employer’s plan knows how frustrating it can be. Every administrator has their own forms. Timelines are all over the place. Paper checks show up weeks later with vague instructions. The whole thing should have been fixed a long time ago.

The IRS is finally doing something about it. Notice 2026-49 puts out four sample forms and a five-step procedure meant to bring some consistency to direct rollovers. Plans do not have to use them, and there is no safe harbor, but you can see where this is going.

The Problem Worth Solving

When you leave a job, you have to figure out what to do with your 401(k). You can cash it out and take the tax hit. You can leave it sitting there. Or you can roll it into a new employer’s plan or an IRA.

A direct rollover is usually the way to go. The money travels straight from the old plan to the new one without ever hitting your bank account, which keeps things clean and avoids the 60-day deadline you face if you take possession yourself.

The trouble is that every plan does things differently. A 2024 GAO study found that roughly one in three people doing rollovers ended up with a paper check in hand that they were supposed to forward themselves. Checks get lost. They sit on the counter for weeks. And the whole time, that money is not invested anywhere.

How the New System Works

Here is what Treasury is proposing. You fill out Form 1 and give it to the plan or IRA that will be receiving your money. That form lets the receiving plan reach out to your old plan and handle the transfer on your behalf. The two plans swap Forms 2 through 4 to make sure everything is in order. If something goes sideways, the receiving plan has to tell you.

The IRS wants this done electronically whenever possible. When electronic is not an option, the old plan should write a check payable to the receiving plan for your benefit and mail it directly there. No more sending checks to participants and hoping they take it from there.

Tax Rules Stay the Same

None of this changes how rollovers are taxed. Eligible distributions that complete a proper rollover still stay out of income. You still cannot roll over a required minimum distribution. Pre-tax money stays pre-tax. Roth stays Roth. This is about the plumbing, not the tax code.

IRA-to-IRA transfers are not covered here. Those already go through the ACATS electronic system, so Treasury left them alone.

No Safe Harbor Yet

Plans can use these forms, change them, or ignore them completely. Right now, there is no reward for following along.

That could change. Treasury says it is thinking about offering safe harbors down the road. A receiving plan that uses the standard forms might eventually be allowed to assume the rollover is valid unless something looks off. That would give administrators a real incentive to adopt the new process.

Conclusion and What Comes Next

The IRS has hinted at bigger changes. Future guidance might require electronic transfers across the board, kill off the practice of mailing checks to participants, and get rid of some of the procedural friction that slows things down.

For now, the sample forms are sitting in the appendix of Notice 2026-49. They are there if you want them. If you have ever spent weeks tracking down a check that went to the wrong address or trying to explain one plan’s process to another plan’s administrator, you understand what Treasury is trying to fix. They want rollovers to be faster, simpler, and harder to mess up. This is a start.

Rolling Over Your 401(k) Just Got Less Painful – Here’s What the IRS Changed

October 1, 2026  ·  Blog, News, Tax and Financial News

⏱ 4 min read

Anyone who has moved retirement money out of an old employer’s plan knows how frustrating it can be. Every administrator has their own forms. Timelines are all over the place. Paper checks show up weeks later with vague instructions. The whole thing should have been fixed a long time ago.

The IRS is finally doing something about it. Notice 2026-49 puts out four sample forms and a five-step procedure meant to bring some consistency to direct rollovers. Plans do not have to use them, and there is no safe harbor, but you can see where this is going.

The Problem Worth Solving

When you leave a job, you have to figure out what to do with your 401(k). You can cash it out and take the tax hit. You can leave it sitting there. Or you can roll it into a new employer’s plan or an IRA.

A direct rollover is usually the way to go. The money travels straight from the old plan to the new one without ever hitting your bank account, which keeps things clean and avoids the 60-day deadline you face if you take possession yourself.

The trouble is that every plan does things differently. A 2024 GAO study found that roughly one in three people doing rollovers ended up with a paper check in hand that they were supposed to forward themselves. Checks get lost. They sit on the counter for weeks. And the whole time, that money is not invested anywhere.

How the New System Works

Here is what Treasury is proposing. You fill out Form 1 and give it to the plan or IRA that will be receiving your money. That form lets the receiving plan reach out to your old plan and handle the transfer on your behalf. The two plans swap Forms 2 through 4 to make sure everything is in order. If something goes sideways, the receiving plan has to tell you.

The IRS wants this done electronically whenever possible. When electronic is not an option, the old plan should write a check payable to the receiving plan for your benefit and mail it directly there. No more sending checks to participants and hoping they take it from there.

Tax Rules Stay the Same

None of this changes how rollovers are taxed. Eligible distributions that complete a proper rollover still stay out of income. You still cannot roll over a required minimum distribution. Pre-tax money stays pre-tax. Roth stays Roth. This is about the plumbing, not the tax code.

IRA-to-IRA transfers are not covered here. Those already go through the ACATS electronic system, so Treasury left them alone.

No Safe Harbor Yet

Plans can use these forms, change them, or ignore them completely. Right now, there is no reward for following along.

That could change. Treasury says it is thinking about offering safe harbors down the road. A receiving plan that uses the standard forms might eventually be allowed to assume the rollover is valid unless something looks off. That would give administrators a real incentive to adopt the new process.

Conclusion and What Comes Next

The IRS has hinted at bigger changes. Future guidance might require electronic transfers across the board, kill off the practice of mailing checks to participants, and get rid of some of the procedural friction that slows things down.

For now, the sample forms are sitting in the appendix of Notice 2026-49. They are there if you want them. If you have ever spent weeks tracking down a check that went to the wrong address or trying to explain one plan’s process to another plan’s administrator, you understand what Treasury is trying to fix. They want rollovers to be faster, simpler, and harder to mess up. This is a start.

---

Disclaimer 

These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.

Picture two couples, each with a baby born this year, each routing $2,500 of salary into that child’s Trump Account through an employer’s payroll system. One couple sits in the 35% bracket. The other, at roughly $65,000 of taxable income, is in the 12% bracket. Both contributions escape federal income tax. The first couple’s bill shrinks by $875. The second couple’s bill shrinks by $300. Same account, same dollars, nearly three times the benefit for the household that needed it less.

That arithmetic is the quiet story inside what has been presented as a workplace convenience.

Congress Built the Benefit – The IRS Just Wrote the Manual

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act already let employers put up to $2,500 a year into an employee’s or a dependent’s Trump Account without adding to the worker’s income, and it already allowed a company to run that contribution through a Section 125 cafeteria plan so the employee funds a child’s account out of pre-tax salary. Employers could begin on July 4, 2026. What Treasury and the IRS published on Aug. 11 is the operating manual: how to structure the program, how nondiscrimination testing works, and a safe harbor for companies that want to match the government’s $1,000.

The Break Stops at the Income Tax Line

It is easy to overstate what “pre-tax” buys here. The exclusion applies to federal income tax only. The money stays wages for Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment tax purposes. So, the savings amount to nothing more than the sum deferred multiplied by the filer’s top income tax rate, which is precisely why $2,500 is worth $875 to a 35% taxpayer and $300 to a 12% taxpayer.

Postponed for Decades, Not Years

Nor is the tax forgiven. Nothing can be withdrawn throughout the rule’s growth period, which runs until January 1 of the year the child turns 18. From that date, the account behaves like any other traditional IRA, meaning a 10% additional tax on distributions taken before age 59½ unless an exception applies, on top of ordinary income tax. The realistic horizon is four decades or more, not the college fund some families picture.

On the basics: Trump Accounts, Section 530A of the code, came out of last year’s OBBBA. A child who is a U.S. citizen born from 2025 through 2028 can receive a one-time $1,000 federal deposit, though it is not automatic. A parent has to open the account and elect the deposit on Form 4547, and the child needs a Social Security number. Contributions from all sources top out at $5,000 a year at current levels, indexed for inflation after 2027. The money must sit in a fund tracking a broad index of mostly U.S. stocks, with no leverage and fees capped at a tenth of a percent.

Taxation on the way out follows the money’s path in. Dollars contributed with after-tax income create basis and come back untaxed. Everything else, meaning the federal $1,000, employer contributions, pre-tax payroll elections and all investment earnings, is ordinary income when withdrawn.

Not Every Parent Will Get the Chance

Access tilts the same direction. Mercer surveyed close to 350 employers in April and found roughly 4% expecting to launch a contribution program in 2026 or 2027, with about two-thirds ruling it out. Adoption skews toward large firms with real benefits infrastructure, the same employers already offering generous 401(k) matches. A parent at a small company may never see the option. Anyone self-employed is excluded by rule: partners, sole proprietors, and more-than-2% S corporation shareholders cannot make the pre-tax election even if their own company sponsors a program for its common-law employees.

There is a planning burden, too. Households with finite savings already ration dollars across retirement accounts, 529 plans and emergency reserves. A pre-tax Trump Account election adds another comparison, and the families most likely to get it right are the ones who can afford advice.

Conclusion

The regulations are proposals. Written comments close Sept. 25, and a hearing is set for Oct. 15, so the final text could shift. Employers may rely on the proposed rules in the meantime. What is unlikely to shift is the underlying arithmetic. The $1,000 from Treasury lands identically in every eligible child’s account. The pre-tax payroll option does not, and its value climbs with the parent’s bracket.

New Trump Account Updates

September 1, 2026  ·  Blog, News, Tax and Financial News

⏱ 4 min read

Picture two couples, each with a baby born this year, each routing $2,500 of salary into that child’s Trump Account through an employer’s payroll system. One couple sits in the 35% bracket. The other, at roughly $65,000 of taxable income, is in the 12% bracket. Both contributions escape federal income tax. The first couple’s bill shrinks by $875. The second couple’s bill shrinks by $300. Same account, same dollars, nearly three times the benefit for the household that needed it less.

That arithmetic is the quiet story inside what has been presented as a workplace convenience.

Congress Built the Benefit – The IRS Just Wrote the Manual

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act already let employers put up to $2,500 a year into an employee’s or a dependent’s Trump Account without adding to the worker’s income, and it already allowed a company to run that contribution through a Section 125 cafeteria plan so the employee funds a child’s account out of pre-tax salary. Employers could begin on July 4, 2026. What Treasury and the IRS published on Aug. 11 is the operating manual: how to structure the program, how nondiscrimination testing works, and a safe harbor for companies that want to match the government’s $1,000.

The Break Stops at the Income Tax Line

It is easy to overstate what “pre-tax” buys here. The exclusion applies to federal income tax only. The money stays wages for Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment tax purposes. So, the savings amount to nothing more than the sum deferred multiplied by the filer’s top income tax rate, which is precisely why $2,500 is worth $875 to a 35% taxpayer and $300 to a 12% taxpayer.

Postponed for Decades, Not Years

Nor is the tax forgiven. Nothing can be withdrawn throughout the rule’s growth period, which runs until January 1 of the year the child turns 18. From that date, the account behaves like any other traditional IRA, meaning a 10% additional tax on distributions taken before age 59½ unless an exception applies, on top of ordinary income tax. The realistic horizon is four decades or more, not the college fund some families picture.

On the basics: Trump Accounts, Section 530A of the code, came out of last year’s OBBBA. A child who is a U.S. citizen born from 2025 through 2028 can receive a one-time $1,000 federal deposit, though it is not automatic. A parent has to open the account and elect the deposit on Form 4547, and the child needs a Social Security number. Contributions from all sources top out at $5,000 a year at current levels, indexed for inflation after 2027. The money must sit in a fund tracking a broad index of mostly U.S. stocks, with no leverage and fees capped at a tenth of a percent.

Taxation on the way out follows the money’s path in. Dollars contributed with after-tax income create basis and come back untaxed. Everything else, meaning the federal $1,000, employer contributions, pre-tax payroll elections and all investment earnings, is ordinary income when withdrawn.

Not Every Parent Will Get the Chance

Access tilts the same direction. Mercer surveyed close to 350 employers in April and found roughly 4% expecting to launch a contribution program in 2026 or 2027, with about two-thirds ruling it out. Adoption skews toward large firms with real benefits infrastructure, the same employers already offering generous 401(k) matches. A parent at a small company may never see the option. Anyone self-employed is excluded by rule: partners, sole proprietors, and more-than-2% S corporation shareholders cannot make the pre-tax election even if their own company sponsors a program for its common-law employees.

There is a planning burden, too. Households with finite savings already ration dollars across retirement accounts, 529 plans and emergency reserves. A pre-tax Trump Account election adds another comparison, and the families most likely to get it right are the ones who can afford advice.

Conclusion

The regulations are proposals. Written comments close Sept. 25, and a hearing is set for Oct. 15, so the final text could shift. Employers may rely on the proposed rules in the meantime. What is unlikely to shift is the underlying arithmetic. The $1,000 from Treasury lands identically in every eligible child’s account. The pre-tax payroll option does not, and its value climbs with the parent’s bracket.

---

Disclaimer 

These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.